Wee Scoops

Measure for Measure

One day, will there be no “them”?

“In an electric information environment, minority groups can no longer be contained – ignored. Too many people know too much about each other. Our new environment compels commitment and participation. We have become irrevocably involved with, and responsible for, each other.”

From “The Medium is the Massage” by Marshall McLuhan and Quentin Fiore. published 1967 by Jerome Agel.

I think it is about time I re-read “The Medium is the Massage”. These words written before I was born pretty accurately anticipate the opportunities that have since become commonly seen in society.

The internet has been hugely democratizing; any minority, indeed any individual, can potentially be heard by any listener in the world. Niche groups can find like minded individuals anywhere in the world and build community. The “sharing” that goes on means that points of view can be stated and sometimes understood. Suspicion and guesswork about historical groups of “others” is reduced. (unless people over-self-select the echo chamber of their own thoughts, which they do…)

A similar idea was included in J.B. Priestley’s play “An Inspector Calls” where the mysterious inspector leaves with a warning for the other characters:

“We don’t live alone. We are members of one body. We are responsible for each other. And I tell you that the time will soon come when if men will not learn that lesson, then they will be taught it in fire and blood and anguish. Good night.”

J.B. Priestley, An Inspector Calls

Set in 1912 and first performed in the 1940s, it is thought that the inspector was warning the characters about the fire, blood and anguish of the first world war.

It seems that these writers are pointing towards a theoretical solution for peace – that if there was no “them” and humanity could consider itself a unity and be mutually responsible, then “blood, fire and anguish” could be avoided.

This theme is also touched on in E.M. Forster’s “A Passage to India”, the tone of the passage gently mocking the missionary characters:

“All invitations must proceed from heaven perhaps; perhaps it is futile for men to initiate their own unity, they do but widen the gulfs between them by the attempt. So at all events thought old Mr Graysford and young Mr Sorley, the devoted missionaries (…) In our Father’s room are many mansions, they taught, and there alone till the incompatible multitude of mankind be welcomed and soothed. Not one shall be turned away by the servants on that veranda, be he black or white, not one shall be kept standing who approaches with a loving heart. And why should divine hospitality cease here? Consider, with all reverence, the monkeys. May there not be a mansion for the monkeys also? Old Mr Graysford said No, but young Mr Sorley, who was advanced, said Yes; he saw no reason why monkeys should not have their collateral share of bliss, and he had sympathetic discussions about them with his Hindu friends. And the jackals? Jackals were indeed less to Mr Sorley’s mind, but he admitted that the mercy of God, being infinite, may well embrace all mammals And the wasps? He became uneasy during the descent to wasps, and was apt to change the conversation. And oranges, cactuses, crystals and mud? And the bacteria inside Mr Sorley? No, no, this is going too far. We must exclude someone from our gathering, or we shall be left with nothing.”

So the missionaries conclude, “we must exclude someone from our gathering, or we shall be left with nothing.”

In the world today, there is a sense of a large “us”. And there are a few pockets of “them” – at least, that’s the way the media presents the world to me.

Lines in the sand have been drawn separating the us from the them – when people overstep in regards to their oppression and abuse of others, war-mongering, intolerance etc.

The abuser, the terrorist, the person whose political views we find abhorrent, the ignorant thug, the hardened criminal, the infuriating philosopher – these are the “them” that “we” still have.

Despite the first quote saying “we have become irrevocably involved with and responsible for each other” and the second quote saying “We are members of one body”, “we” can find it impossible to identify with those that oppose the values and beliefs that we hold dear.

By being me, and thinking what I think, do I “exclude someone from our gathering”? I don’t think so. I hope not.

I think I am about to stumble into the paradox of equality and diversity. I’ll leave that for another day!

Advertisements

Single Post Navigation

10 thoughts on “One day, will there be no “them”?

  1. Fine writing and thinking :). It reminded me of the books I read in political science class called Our Common Future and the other was Common Ground; both dealt with futuristic possibilities of computerization and “Internet” and how they would open up our world and diminish the spaces between us. Exciting stuff back in the 1980’s, it makes me sadder today to see our governments try to stem protests and manifestations. The idealistic nature of those two books made myself and my classmates very optimistic for the future. I suppose that we can still be hopeful.

    • We are very much allowed to protest – with some laws about distance from the opposition and some concerns about people filming people they oppose. I have never taken part in a protest though about anything, I don’t think.

      • The one time that I participated in a type of “protest” was in Edinburgh back in 1987 at an Anti-Apartheid peace rally. It was peaceful and we were left alone by the police. I loved Edinburgh, the entire countryside was so beautiful. I adored my time in your country. 😀

  2. theotheri on said:

    Yes! I find it fascinating that we come from such different backgrounds,different ages, you with an understanding of literature that far outstrips mine, me with a fascination with science. And yet we have come up against the same challenge: how to resolve equality with diversity, individuality within the whole of which we are each a part.

    • The literature thing is weird. I read lots twenty years ago and now it just comes back to me in little fragments. The joy of the internet it that I can google the fragment and find the original text. It is funny the things my mind decided to keep a hold of.
      Yes – equality and diversity will be next.

  3. Very thought-provoking, a good mental workout for the start of the year!

    You identity several barriers between “us” and “them” including inforrmation, race, gender, the law, philosophical differences. Different strategies required for each. For example, re the last, surely an openness of mind and attitude of respect goes much of the way to dealing with same? Can I also add (lack of) opportunity and poverty to the list?!

  4. Wishing you are happy New Years!!! 🙂 Jackie

  5. Pingback: A View from a Tree #zacchaeus #equality #grace | Wee Scoops

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: