Wee Scoops

Measure for Measure


The Mona Lisa.

The Mona Lisa. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 It seems to me that irony has perhaps had its day.  Authenticity is now in vogue. It’s a shame. I love irony. No really, I love irony.

Maybe it is Twitter’s fault. When people tweet something ironic, there’s a wee flutter and a panic. It’s safer to tweet sincerely. Less libelous, probably

It’s sad though. Irony is how I get through life. If I am stuck in a dull meeting about how to do something better/well/more relevantly …  internally (and sometimes externally) I get the giggles because of the irony.

There are some forms of sincerity that bother me. The most grating is the kind of sincerity that presenters look for on ‘talent’ shows – they need the poor old contestant to say “It means the world to me and I’ll be gutted if I have to leave the process”. The presenter is particularly pleased if there is a demonstration of what they call “emotion”.  Apparently emotion is a crowd puller. Especially if it is sincere.

I have a problem with schmaltz.

If I was to say something schmaltzy, I would be being ironic. Unless I was being sincere, in which case people would think I was being ironic, which would be ironic. It’s a win-win.

So saying, most of the time I mean what I mean and that’s what I say and I am not being ironic. People just assume that that can’t be what I actually think so they think I might be being ironic, or pulling a double bluff.

But, I have noticed in the media of late there has been a wee theme emerging about authenticity winning out over artifice. That could explain the swing from fictional drama to ‘reality’  TV (or was that not really to do with low budgets?).

There are, apparently, worries in the Art world that the age of Art might be almost over – as anything can be seen anywhere; anything can be replicated and broadcast globally in seconds. The defence of Art is that the original piece of art exists somewhere in a time or place as a framed picture, a sculpture or an installation or whatever – and that replications or pictures taken of art are never the same as the original.

What is valued is the ‘real thing’; the authentic version.

Although, I have to admit, when I saw the Mona Lisa when I was about fifteen or so, it just looked like the Mona Lisa. Any potential wow-factor was completely gone because I knew what it was going to look like, and that’s what it looked like. In fact, the most important striking visual in the room was not the painting itself, but the robustness of the glass case and the crowds of people all squishing up together to see the real thing.

I wonder if this perceived swing towards all things authentic are a subconscious defence against society’s rejection of ‘truth’. Truth was too definite for people. If you had truth, then some people would be wrong so we CAN’T HAVE THAT, now, can we…?

At least with sincerity and authenticity we can have real and true things intended by the speaker/artist/director.  And this seems to be what society is after these days, or so the media would seem to suggest, from my very random intake from it in the last few weeks.

Do you thrive on irony or does it unsettle you so you don’t know what’s what? Or do you like spades to be spades?

Or do you like a spade to be a piece of installation art that you can take a picture of and tweet?

*thinks, this is one of these posts that I’ll think no one will understand and winces at the thought of the tumbleweed it’ll generate in cyberspace*

POSTSCRIPT: I am now enjoying finding it ironic that I used art as an example of something authentic, when, at best, it is a representation…


Single Post Navigation

5 thoughts on “Really?

  1. I enjoyed this immensely. Alannis Morrisette ruined the word irony for me with her hit song Isn’t It Ironic? where every single instance she sang about wasn’t ironic, it was just plain bad luck. Reality t.v came to us via the Hollywood writer’s strike and when the powers that be discovered that they could make tons more money with reality t.v, poor us the viewers. I can really relate to what you wrote about seeing the Mona Lisa at the age 15, the thick glass was my focal point as well. 🙂

  2. You are right.
    We can not possibly have anyone being wrong, so it is a win-win! 😉

  3. What happened to my reply? Did Simon Cowell threaten to sue?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: